It's beggin' time!

Submitted by Robert Jung on Fri, 09/30/2005 - 9:00am.

No, not for me. For my kid's school.

All you parents out there know what I'm talking about: when the leaves start to fall and the kids return to class, they come home with the annual school fundraiser packets. Catalogs filled with cookie dough, gift wrapping, generically inoffensive gimcrackery, all marked up at outrageous prices for guilty families to browbeat their friends and relatives into buying the stuff and pour some money to your child's education.

Now, maybe I'm nostalgicizing a bit, but I don't remember doing this stuff when I went to school. I do remember doing door-to-door sales of magazine subscriptions (a no-no nowadays), but that didn't happen until I was around 10 or so. My son, on the other hand, was bringing home stuff as soon as he hit kindergarden; which meant, in addition to the usual embarassment of having to pester my extended family into buying this stuff, I also have my kid gushing about all the kewl gimcrackery he'll get by selling more stuff.

Of course, it's all an elaborate game with my family -- I buy their kids' fundraising stuff, and they buy my kid's fundraising stuff (though, of course, the families with more kids have an advantage here). But wouldn't it be easier if the schools just sent the kids home with an alms envelope and just have the parents dump some bills into the thing? It'd probably be more efficient, since the schools don't have to pay overhead to whoever does the promotional materials and stuff, and the parents would spend less as well (instead of buying a $10 roll of wrapping paper and having $7 go to the school, just give the school the $7 and be done with it).

I don't blame the schools or the teachers for this; I know educational budgets are tight, and bureaucratic threats like No Child Left Behind just makes things worse.

This is, instead, just another symptom of a systemic problem with the nation's education system -- that while we give lip service to "quality education" and "investing in the future," Our leaders aren't willing to put our money where our mouths are. They'd rather underfund schools and smear teachers, because it's easier to nickel and dime the parents through the back door instead of doing any actual work.

Yeah yeah, I know, if you give more money to the schools, you risk abuse of funds. But considering that the schools are already starving as it is -- and with our government willing to write blank checks for other, more privileged groups -- I'm willing to take that chance.

And if it means I don't have to go around soliciting funds or buying craft supplies for my kid's classroom, that's all the better.

Categories - Politics :: Rant :: Whatever

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
dvandom's picture
Submitted by dvandom on Fri, 09/30/2005 - 5:20pm.

My dad was a high school band teacher when I was a kid, so fundraising crud was always going on. And I went to a Catholic grade school, so we were doing the crapselling for that. And then there was the mandatory Cub Scouts/Boy Scouts crapselling. All with cheesy prizes.

By the time I was in high school, my parents were sick of it. If I had a choir trip or my brother and sister a band trip, mom would just ask how much it cost and write a check, rather than screw around with fundraisers.

Unfortunately, they really play on the competitive nature of little kids, so you probably can't get away with doing that with Victor at this point. Even if you buy him an equivalent prize, he'll be unhappy, since he's not WINNING it. :/

Robert Jung's picture
Submitted by Robert Jung on Mon, 10/03/2005 - 10:11pm.

I'm not too sick of the fundraisers at this point, since it generally comes once a year. But another thing that does irk me a tad is when parents are asked to "donate" school supplies (markers, pipe cleaners, papers) for the classrooms as well. It's certainly not as if the teachers don't know where to find this stuff -- especially when they give out instructions on what stores and what supplies they're looking for -- but it's the underlying "I don't have the funds for something as piddly as this" that's the symptom of the problem.

Don't have a problem with competitive kids right now, since my son's happy if he just gets the shiny spiffs like the others do, but I do wonder if the time spent on these promotions couldn't be better spent in actual edumacashkonal stuff instead.

--R.J.

dvandom's picture
Submitted by dvandom on Tue, 10/04/2005 - 4:09am.

Teachers don't get funds for student school supplies, actually. A lot of times they have to supply the students out of their own pockets...and even leaving aside that beginning teachers tend to have pretty empty pockets to start with, it can add up fast over an entire class.

Robert Jung's picture
Submitted by Robert Jung on Tue, 10/04/2005 - 6:25am.

"Teachers don't get funds for student school supplies, actually."

Now that be whack.

--R.J.

dvandom's picture
Submitted by dvandom on Tue, 10/04/2005 - 8:18am.

They don't get ZERO budget, mind you. Usually. But they rarely get anywhere near enough money to cover what they actually need to have in order to do their jobs, especially at the elementary level where there's so much more arts and crafts stuff to do. Sometimes they make a devil's bargain and accept kits from business "donors", but these kits tend to be thinly veiled advertising (like a counting kit that has kids count images of Coke cans).

It's a little easier at the secondary school level, since most of what kids need consists of textbooks and notebooks, and a lot of schools just have separate fees for those who want to take art courses (and students have always had to pay in some way to be in band, either renting or buying their instrument).