No, not for me. For my kid's school.
All you parents out there know what I'm talking about: when the leaves start to fall and the kids return to class, they come home with the annual school fundraiser packets. Catalogs filled with cookie dough, gift wrapping, generically inoffensive gimcrackery, all marked up at outrageous prices for guilty families to browbeat their friends and relatives into buying the stuff and pour some money to your child's education.
Now, maybe I'm nostalgicizing a bit, but I don't remember doing this stuff when I went to school. I do remember doing door-to-door sales of magazine subscriptions (a no-no nowadays), but that didn't happen until I was around 10 or so. My son, on the other hand, was bringing home stuff as soon as he hit kindergarden; which meant, in addition to the usual embarassment of having to pester my extended family into buying this stuff, I also have my kid gushing about all the kewl gimcrackery he'll get by selling more stuff.
Of course, it's all an elaborate game with my family -- I buy their kids' fundraising stuff, and they buy my kid's fundraising stuff (though, of course, the families with more kids have an advantage here). But wouldn't it be easier if the schools just sent the kids home with an alms envelope and just have the parents dump some bills into the thing? It'd probably be more efficient, since the schools don't have to pay overhead to whoever does the promotional materials and stuff, and the parents would spend less as well (instead of buying a $10 roll of wrapping paper and having $7 go to the school, just give the school the $7 and be done with it).
I don't blame the schools or the teachers for this; I know educational budgets are tight, and bureaucratic threats like No Child Left Behind just makes things worse.
This is, instead, just another symptom of a systemic problem with the nation's education system -- that while we give lip service to "quality education" and "investing in the future," Our leaders aren't willing to put our money where our mouths are. They'd rather underfund schools and smear teachers, because it's easier to nickel and dime the parents through the back door instead of doing any actual work.
Yeah yeah, I know, if you give more money to the schools, you risk abuse of funds. But considering that the schools are already starving as it is -- and with our government willing to write blank checks for other, more privileged groups -- I'm willing to take that chance.
And if it means I don't have to go around soliciting funds or buying craft supplies for my kid's classroom, that's all the better.

Recent comments
1 week 3 days ago
1 week 3 days ago
1 week 4 days ago
6 weeks 3 days ago
6 weeks 4 days ago