Yeah! (What he said)

Submitted by Robert Jung on Tue, 03/14/2006 - 8:48am.

Quoting author Peter David, for great truth:

So Bush's numbers are dropping and dropping and dropping and are now around...what? Thirty percent approval? Something like that?

Here's what I don't get: Two years ago, when people voted for him...

WHAT THE HELL DID YOU THINK HE WAS GOING TO DO IF NOT CONTINUE TO SCREW THINGS UP?!?

I mean, honest to God. NOW nearly four out of five people are expressing disapproval? NOW?! What the bleeding hell were you expecting two years ago when you pulled the lever or filled out the ballot for him? Did you think he was suddenly going to get smart? Did you think he was going to stop screwing the country up?

And that's why he's the New York Times bestselling author, and not me, because PAD can state the bleedin' obvious while I have to trip over it... Winking smiley

Categories - Current Events :: Funny :: Politics

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
dvandom's picture
Submitted by dvandom on Tue, 03/14/2006 - 5:24pm.

Remember, the code Republican campaign strategy was NOT to get people to vote for Bush, it was to get them to vote AGAINST Kerry while also convincing them that any third party choice would be a wasted vote.

And that's it. Chimpy the Prez wasn't a resume-padding (well, he was) liberal spendthrift (he was a conservative spendthrift) who threw his medals over the White House fence (he had none to throw).

Robert Jung's picture
Submitted by Robert Jung on Tue, 03/14/2006 - 6:03pm.

Well, the strategy was accurate, anyway, as George W. Bush is nothing like Kerry -- competent, intelligent, involved...

Granted, Bush is better at the "aw shucks" folksy routine than Kerry will ever be, but choosing a leader based on his geniality in a bar is like choosing a doctor based on the color of his office walls.

--R.J.