(Someone else's) thought for the day

I just find it kind of staggering that Clinton is out of office for six years now and Bush supporters are STILL trying to use him as a WMD: Weapon of Media Deflection. Anytime Bush does anything, they try to deflect criticism by claiming, "Oh yeah, well... Clinton did something similar/dissimilar-but-let's-pretend-it-was-similar, and so how come Bush gets criticized? Huh? How come? Huh?"

As if Clinton was never criticized. As if he wasn't frickin' impeached.

How about this notion, Bushies: How about that Bush and his strutting, preening, self-righteous, holier than thou associates should be endeavoring to be SUPERIOR to Clinton? How in the world is, "Yeah, well... the previous guy was no better!" any sort of a defense anyplace other than in the mind of Bush's most devoted and myopic supporters?